3 (Similar to medium but increased Noise Reduction has less Detail and stronger effect in the Blue-Yellow channel.(Instead of my LCP, you can also use RT’s “auto correction distortion” which attempts to align the RAW image with its already corrected JPEG thumbnail). (PhotoNinja is much nicer on that front.) Hence, these are far from perfect. I’m new to all of this and using Adobe Lens Profile Creator is arduous. Below are two processing profiles and a lens correction profile (LCP). Rawtherapee (RT) is capable (and powerful, cross-platform, and open source) but requires various profiles to render a good image. Shooting RAW (which has some advantages relative to dynamic range and white balance) can be more challenging task because software may not be up to the task of demosaicing the sensor, correcting lens distortions, and rendering a pleasing image. Ive tried it at all different zoom levels, including 100 (the one I. RAW 9.2fps (slowed after 21 shots to 2fps) Noise reduction showing no change at any zoom Im using RawTherapee and none of the noise reduction sliders make even the slightest difference, no matter how far I slide them.or enable Custom/Direct_Focus_Area recenter and disable.The best focus mode on moving person was 1-area followed closely by tracking, until person gets too close and tracking loses its lock.AFF is updated and AFC predicts vector no difference in practice.I generally prefer 1-area focus with the focus and recompose technique.The camera is capable but finicky, especially because its depth-of-field is so thin with close objects. Fortunately, it is very configurable, indeed, you really must learn how to configure it to be happy with the photos. I’m fond of the Lumix LX100, although I do not like its default settings. Lumix LX100 and Rawtherapee Lumix LX100 and Rawtherapee
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |